<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    <title>Time in the wind - Photography and Digital Imaging</title>
    <link>http://www.timeinthewind.com/</link>
    <description>&quot;Time in the wind wears away all that is superficial.&quot;</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.0.4 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    
    

<item>
    <title>Vegas Video Studio</title>
    <link>http://www.timeinthewind.com/index.php?/archives/22-Vegas-Video-Studio.html</link>
            <category>Photography and Digital Imaging</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.timeinthewind.com/index.php?/archives/22-Vegas-Video-Studio.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.timeinthewind.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=22</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.timeinthewind.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=22</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Scott Lewis)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Though photography remains my favorite medium, I have renewed my interest in videography. I bought an inexpensive SD card based video camera and Sony&#039;s Vegas Video Studio software. I used Vegas in the past for video editing and decided to try the lighter weight Studio package for laptop use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So far I&#039;m really happy with Vegas Video Studio but not so happy with the JVC Everio camcorder. It&#039;s too small and light. These seemed like good things when shopping but video isn&#039;t photography and I&#039;m longing for something more substantial to help insure steady shots, smoother panning, etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:19:58 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timeinthewind.com/index.php?/archives/22-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Digital Imaging Software Part II</title>
    <link>http://www.timeinthewind.com/index.php?/archives/13-Digital-Imaging-Software-Part-II.html</link>
            <category>Photography and Digital Imaging</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.timeinthewind.com/index.php?/archives/13-Digital-Imaging-Software-Part-II.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.timeinthewind.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=13</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.timeinthewind.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=13</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Scott Lewis)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    I recently discovered that &lt;a href=&quot;http://sonic.net/~rat/lightcrafts/&quot;  title=&quot;Lightzone for Linux&quot;&gt;Lightzone is available in a Linux version&lt;/a&gt;. Though not as supported as the Windows version, this version is currently free. I have it running and will be testing it more thoroughly in the coming weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have not worked out the overall workflow yet but it looks like the basic software toolset is Picassa for general sorting and viewing with Lightzone for RAW processing and more detailed editing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The completeness and ease of Photoshop Elements for processing NEF/RAW, managing images and outputting in a variety of fun formats is still pretty appealing. The counter-balance is that I use Linux as my primary desktop and would prefer not to deal with three operating systems (Windows for Photoshop Elements, Linux for almost everything else and Mac OS X for my iTunes which is on an old Macbook).&lt;br /&gt;
 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:37:21 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timeinthewind.com/index.php?/archives/13-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>New Gallery</title>
    <link>http://www.timeinthewind.com/index.php?/archives/7-New-Gallery.html</link>
            <category>Photography and Digital Imaging</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.timeinthewind.com/index.php?/archives/7-New-Gallery.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.timeinthewind.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=7</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.timeinthewind.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=7</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Scott Lewis)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    I just added an &lt;a href=&quot;http://timeinthewind.com/gallery/index.php&quot;  title=&quot;Go directly to the photo gallery&quot;&gt;online photo gallery&lt;/a&gt; to this site. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;ve only uploaded a small number of photos so far. Winter has finally arrived here. I look forward to making interesting images in the snow, ice and cold but I don&#039;t enjoy going out in the cold rain and sleet and that&#039;s what we&#039;re having now.  So much for that 70 degree weekend I wrote about last time.  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 19:43:22 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timeinthewind.com/index.php?/archives/7-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>70 degrees in New England in January</title>
    <link>http://www.timeinthewind.com/index.php?/archives/6-70-degrees-in-New-England-in-January.html</link>
            <category>Photography and Digital Imaging</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.timeinthewind.com/index.php?/archives/6-70-degrees-in-New-England-in-January.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.timeinthewind.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=6</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.timeinthewind.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Scott Lewis)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    To say our weather has been unusually mild doesn&#039;t really paint an accurate picture. We have had no appreciable snow, 20% lower than normal heating costs and, yesterday, it was 70 degrees around here. Today it is 15 degrees cooler which is still 15 degrees above average for this time of year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We took advantage of this weather and got out for a hike yesterday at Drumlin Farm in Lincoln, MA. Drumlin Farm is a nice mix of working farm with gardens and animals and walking trails with birds and other wildlife. There are a few animals in captivity that are not farm animals. For various reasons, they cannot go back to the wild. There&#039;s a pair of owls that are each blind in one eye, a red-tail hawk with a bad wing, two red foxes, one that is a rare black and white &quot;red&quot; box.  Since they are all behind fences, they don&#039;t make great pictures. The larger farm animals are the exception since they&#039;re in pens and fenced in fields, not cages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;serendipity_imageComment_right&quot; style=&quot;width: 320px&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;serendipity_imageComment_img&quot;&gt;&lt;img width=&#039;320&#039; height=&#039;214&#039;  src=&quot;http://www.timeinthewind.com/uploads/DSC_0073.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;serendipity_imageComment_txt&quot;&gt;A goat at Drumlin Farm, Lincoln, MA&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also got some extra exercise and fresh air today by going for a hike in Sarah Doublet Forest in Littleton, MA and a second, shorter walk in the Cobb Trust conservation land nearby.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;serendipity_imageComment_center&quot; style=&quot;width: 320px&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;serendipity_imageComment_img&quot;&gt;&lt;img width=&#039;320&#039; height=&#039;214&#039;  src=&quot;http://www.timeinthewind.com/uploads/DSC_0102.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;serendipity_imageComment_txt&quot;&gt;Leaves in Sarah Doublet Forest, Littleton, MA&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;m finding that, for some shots, I&#039;m pleased with the camera&#039;s choices. For some of the farm shots yesterday, the cloudier weather seemed to fool it into not picking daylight when it should have and I had to adjust the white balance to get a satisfying image.  In fact, white balance is the setting I most often disagree with the camera over.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The moral of the story?  Know what your camera is doing for you and help it make the right choice by getting out of automatic mode when you think it will be fooled. That or shoot all RAW all the time and make the right choices later in the computer. I don&#039;t want to work that hard on every casual image. &lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;m saving to NEF and JPEG right now so I can be lazy with casual shots but not have regrets when the perfect picture presents itself.  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 17:13:57 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timeinthewind.com/index.php?/archives/6-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Digital Imaging Software Part I</title>
    <link>http://www.timeinthewind.com/index.php?/archives/5-Digital-Imaging-Software-Part-I.html</link>
            <category>Photography and Digital Imaging</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.timeinthewind.com/index.php?/archives/5-Digital-Imaging-Software-Part-I.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.timeinthewind.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=5</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.timeinthewind.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=5</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Scott Lewis)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    We&#039;ve had wet weather and I haven&#039;t been able to get out to take many photos with the new camera. Instead I&#039;ve been trying out a lot of software. I&#039;ve tried Photoshop CS3 beta, Photoshop Lightroom beta, Photoshop Elements, all from Adobe and I&#039;ve also tried Nikon&#039;s Capture NX, Capture Editor and Picture Perfect. I tried Corel Paintshop Pro Photo and Snapfire. I tried Lightzone from Lightcrafts. Since I use Linux most of the time and these are all Windows and / or Mac products, I also tried a combination of F-Spot, The Gimp and Google&#039;s Picassa to see if I could stay all Linux all the time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
F-Spot and Picassa as well as Snapfire and Picture Perfect seem best for casual editing and cool print options but lack the high-end tools for good RAW handling and automated batch processes for repetitive workflows. On the other hand, Capture NX and Photoshop, et al have all kinds of powerful features but no fun print templates, photo albums, etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Photoshop Elements may be the choice for now since it handles NEF (Nikon&#039;s RAW files) and has fun output options like calendars, photo album pages, bordered prints, slideshows and video CD.  Stay tuned for updates as I try out all these programs for the next 30 days.  If you have found the perfect solution, please add a comment or send me an email.  
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:03:24 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timeinthewind.com/index.php?/archives/5-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Hands-on with the D80</title>
    <link>http://www.timeinthewind.com/index.php?/archives/4-Hands-on-with-the-D80.html</link>
            <category>Photography and Digital Imaging</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.timeinthewind.com/index.php?/archives/4-Hands-on-with-the-D80.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.timeinthewind.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=4</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.timeinthewind.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Scott Lewis)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    I got the Nikon D80 that I mentioned in my last entry, charged the battery and headed off to Springfield, MA for dinner with my brother and his family and my Aunt and Uncle. My nephew is 3, very cute and loves to make funny faces: a good subject for trying out the indoor performance of the camera. I had only the built-in flash. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First observation is that the focus assist beam is very noticeable. I kept worrying the people a few tables behind my subject when they&#039;d notice this horizontal beam of light across their table. It did make for fast focusing in low light though. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&#039;ve heard reports that the automatic white balancing of most D-SLR&#039;s leaves something to be desired. In this case, the white balance with the flash was fine since the flash was providing much of the light for the main subject.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 18mm-135mm f3.5-4.5 zoom that came in the kit (my compromise while trying to find an 18mm-200mm VR) actually performs great for my indoor needs. I&#039;ll want the extra telephoto range when I get outdoors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As I mentioned in my last entry, I&#039;m more interested in convenience than when I used to be willing to carry 5 or more lenses and 2 bodies to even the most casual occaision. The D80 does not dissappoint. With that 27mm - 205mm equivalent zoom range, solid built-in flash performance and alleged 2,700 shots per charge (without the flash, I&#039;m sure), it can handle places I&#039;ve settled for point and shoot digital as well as go places I was still bringing the whole 35mm film kit for lack of a better digital camera.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:25:38 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timeinthewind.com/index.php?/archives/4-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Digital SLR Decision</title>
    <link>http://www.timeinthewind.com/index.php?/archives/3-Digital-SLR-Decision.html</link>
            <category>Photography and Digital Imaging</category>
    
    <comments>http://www.timeinthewind.com/index.php?/archives/3-Digital-SLR-Decision.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.timeinthewind.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=3</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.timeinthewind.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=3</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Scott Lewis)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    In some areas I&#039;ve always been an early adopter. Photography hasn&#039;t been one of those areas in a long time. I&#039;ve stuck with 35mm film for serious picture taking while using small point and shoot digital cameras when convenience was more important than quality.  No more. I&#039;ve decided to make the leap to Digital SLR Photography. I&#039;ve given most of my 35mm cameras to a local school&#039;s photo program.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My 35mm cameras have always been Pentax and I have a good selection of their lenses. As such, I really wanted to love the new Pentax K10D. I read the dpreview.com review got discouraged, mostly over the sharpness or lack thereof. I am moving to digital partly because of convenience and I don&#039;t want to have to work at each and every picture doing my own RAW conversions to get good images. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since Pentax started looking less interesting (and then the Hoya-Pentax merger got announced, creating more doubt), I looked next at Canon. My point and shoot digitals are Canon and I&#039;ve been pleasantly surprised with the image quality and color handling. I took a good look at the new Digital Revel XTi and almost bought it. It came up short on a few features I was interested in so I also looked at the higher end Canons but none was the perfect set of features. The 5D lacks a simple built-in flash -- I know the pro models usually don&#039;t include this but convenience is important to me, remember -- I won&#039;t always have a separate flash unit with me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I finally settled on a Nikon D80. It got great reviews and I liked the balance of ease and capability when I tried it out. It was easy finding one right after the holidays but I will be picking one up tomorrow. Nikon also offers the perfect single lens for most of my needs but that is sold out everywhere and it looks like it will be for a while. I&#039;ll always want a few great lens for when the quality is that important but this 18-200mm AF DX VR lens is vibration reduction equipped, light, covers a huge 27 to over 300mm equivalent range and makes it possible to get most of the D-SLR quality without a bag full of lenses. This is especially important when I&#039;m travelling on business and need to fit the camera gear in with the tools of my trade (laptop, cellphone, etc.). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since my love of photography is being rekindled, I plan to post images and write about photography more on this site. Check back for hands on reports on using the D80 and general digital photography tips and tricks. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 22:43:22 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.timeinthewind.com/index.php?/archives/3-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>